stdcntrl.txt
stdcntrl.txt — 3.3 KB
File contents
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Interoffice Memorandum To: Permit Engineers From: Victoria Hsu, P.E., Director, New Source Review Permitting Division Date: April 30, 1997 Subject: Standard Permits for Pollution Control Projects The following guidance is being provided for the implementation of new language contained in section 116.617(1) which will become effective May 22, 1997. The language reads as follows: "This standard permit cannot be used if the registrant receives notification that in the opinion of the executive director there are significant health effects concerns resulting from an increase in emissions of any air contaminant other than those for which a NAAQS has been established, until those concerns are addressed by the registrant to the satisfaction of the executive director." For those standard permit claims involving MANDATORY control requirements, no action by the executive director is the presumed default except in cases where unacceptable health effects concerns are identified. In this case, if unacceptable health effects would be expected to result, the engineer should raise such concerns to his/her team leader/section manager and seek input from the Toxicology and Risk Assessment Section (TARA). If the section manager is in agreement with him/her, the concerns identified by the engineer should be discussed with the NSRP Division Director for a final determination on the acceptability of the standard permit claim. For example, if a regulation dictates a specific type of control device or limits the choice of control options, the executive director would not object to that standard permit claim. In another case, if the regulated entity had a choice of control options and had chosen an option that resulted in wholly unacceptable impacts, the agency should consider raising an objection to that standard permit claim. For standard permit claims involving VOLUNTARY control approaches, the engineer should keep in mind that the standard permit was written to facilitate the construction of projects involving an overall reduction in emissions or a change to a pollutant that is less toxic (i.e. those with a higher ESL). For VOC compound changes, a simple ratio equation of the relative emission rates and relative ESL's should be used. Where combustion devices are being used to abate emissions, there will be no additional review of the emissions of non-criteria pollutants except for the combustion of chlorinated compounds. The requirements for the review of criteria pollutants is already contained within the standard permit. The acceptability of the combustion of chlorinated compounds will need to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. No additional review will be necessary if the combustion device is followed by a scrubber. If the project does not fall under any of these guidelines, the permit engineer in coordination with his/her team leader/section manager and the division director, if necessary, should consider the reductions and/or pollutant changes associated with the project for consistency with the intent of the standard permit, TARA's assessment of the relative effects and any other environmental benefits that would be gained from the project. A final determination of acceptability would be based upon the project representing a net positive environmental change.