Skip to Content
Questions or Comments: tmdl@tceq.texas.gov

Summary Table of Completed TMDLs and I-Plans

Completed load allocations and implementation plans, with dates of adoption and approval by the commission and the EPA
Communities Working Together

On this page:

See Also:

List of Segments with TMDLs

back arrow Back to TMDL Projects

Completed TMDLs and I-Plans

(In alphabetical order by name of water body or region)

TMDL Project

Parameter—Segments
Impairments Addressed in Project Water-Quality Segments Addressed Assessment Units Addressed
TCEQ Date of TMDL Adoption TMDLs Adopted EPA Date
of Action
on TMDLs
TMDLs Approved by EPA TCEQ Date
of I-Plan Approval
TMDLs Addressed by I-Plan
Aquilla Reservoir
Atrazine—1254
1 1 3 Original 03/23/01; Revised 06/14/02 1 10/30/02 1 01/18/02 1
Arenosa Creek
Bacteria—2453C
1 1 1 08/11/21 1 02/02/22  1 08/11/21 1
Armand Bayou in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1113, 1113A, 1113B, 1113C, 1113D , 1113E
6 6 6 08/5/15 6 10/02/15 6 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 6
Armand Bayou—Addendum I
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1113
1 1 1 Via WQMP
10/18
1 02/22/19 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 1
Arroyo Colorado
Legacy Pollutants: DDE, Chlordane, Toxaphene—2202
PCBs—2202A
4 2 13 01/17/01 4 06/14/01 4 09/14/01 4
Arroyo Colorado
Legacy Pollutants: DDT, DDD, dieldrin, endrin, lindane, hexachlorobenzene, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide—2202
8 1 32 07/25/03 8 05/13/04 8 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 9/14/01 8
Austin Area Watersheds
Bacteria—Waller Creek, 1429C; Walnut Creek, 1428B; Spicewood Tributary to Shoal Creek, 1403J; and Taylor Slough South, 1403K
5 4# 5 01/21/15 5 03/18/15 5 01/21/15 5
Austin Area Watersheds Addition
Bacteria—Walnut Creek, Segments 1428B_01, 1428B_02, 1428B_03, and 1428B_04
4 0# 4 Via WQMP
04/15
4 07/27/15 4 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 01/21/15 4
Brays Bayou in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1007B, 1007C, 1007E, 1007L
5 4# 5 09/15/10 5 09/27/10 5 BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 5
Brays Bayou—Addendum I in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1007S, 1007T, 1007U
3 3 3 Via WQMP
04/13
3 08/28/13 3 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 3
Brays Bayou—Addendum II in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1007W
1 1 1 Via WQMP
01/21
1 07/29/21 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 1
Buffalo and Whiteoak Bayous in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1013, 1013A, 1013C, 1014, 1014A, 1014B, 1014E, 1014H, 1014K, 1014L, 1014M, 1014N, 1014O, 1017, 1017A, 1017B, 1017D, 1017E
23 18^ 23 04/08/09 23 06/11/09 23^ BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 23^
Buffalo Bayou—Addendum I
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1017C
1 1 1 Via WQMP
04/13
1 08/28/13 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 1
Buffalo Bayou—Addendum II
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1017F
1 1 1 Via WQMP
04/15
1 07/27/15 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 1
Buffalo Bayou—Addendum III
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1014C
1 1 1 Via WQMP
01/21
1 07/29/21 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 1
Caney Creek Watershed
Bacteria—1304, 1304A
2 2 2 08/11/21 2 02/02/22  2 06/14/23 
Carancahua Bay
Bacteria—2456
1 1 1 08/26/20 1  10/09/20  1 08/26/20 1
Carters Creek Watershed
Bacteria—1209C, 1209D, 1209L
3 3 3 08/22/12 3 09/27/12 3 08/22/12 3
Clear Creek Above and Below Tidal
Chlordane—1101, 1102
2 2 9 01/17/01 2 06/14/01 2 09/14/01 2
Clear Creek Above and Below Tidal
Trichloroethane, Dichloroethane—1101, 1102
4 2 18 Original 02/9/01; Revised 06/14/02 4 05/09/03 4 10/12/01 4
Clear Creek and Tributaries in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1101, 1101B, 1101D, 1102, 1102A, 1102B, 1102C, 1102D, 1102E
18^ 9^ 19 09/10/08 18^ 03/06/09 18^ BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 18^
Clear Creek and Tributaries—Addendum I
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1101A, 1101C, 1101E, and 1102G
4 4 4 Via WQMP 10/12 4 03/12/13 4 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 4
Clear Creek—Addendum II
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1102F
1 1 1 Via WQMP
10/18
1 02/22/19 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 1
Colorado River Below E.V. Spence Reservoir
Chloride, Total Dissolved Solids—1426
2 1 8 02/07/07 2 04/09/07 2 10/10/07 2
Corpus Christi Beaches
Cole Park and Ropes Park Beaches
Bacteria—2481C
2 1 2 07/28/21 2  01/31/22  2    
Cottonwood Branch and Grapevine Creek
in the Greater Trinity Region
Bacteria—0822A, 0822B
2 2 2 09/21/11 2 05/30/12 2 Greater Trinity
I-Plan approved 12/11/2013
2
Dallas Legacy
Chlordane—805, 841
DDD, DDE, DDT, PCBs, Chlordane, Dieldrin, Heptachlor epoxide - 841A
9 3 14 12/20/00 9 06/27/01 9 08/10/01 9
Dickinson Bayou
Bacteria—1103, 1103A, 1103B, 1103C, 1104
8 5# 8 02/08/12 8 06/6/12 8 01/15/14 8
Dickinson Bayou—Addendum I
Bacteria—1103, 1103D, 1103E
3 3 3 Via WQMP 07/16 3 09/30/16 3 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 01/15/14 3
Dickinson Bayou—Addendum II
Bacteria—1103F, 1103G
2 2 2 Via WQMP 04/22 2 08/11/2022 2 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 01/15/14 2
Eastern Houston in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1006F, 1006H, 1007F, 1007G, 1007H, 1007I, 1007K, 1007M, 1007O, 1007R
13 10# 13 09/15/10 13 09/27/10 13 BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 13
Eastern Houston—Addendum
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1007V
1 1 1 Via WQMP 04/13 1 08/28/13 1 Through BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 1
E.V. Spence
Sulfate, TDS—1411
2 1 4 Original 11/17/00; Revised 06/14/02 2 05/09/03 2 08/10/01 2
Fort Worth Legacy
Chlordane—806, 829
DDE, PCBs, Chlordane, Dieldrin—806A
DDE, PCBs, Chlordane, Dieldrin—829A
PCBs—806B
11 5 11 11/17/00 11 05/24/01 11 07/13/01 11
Gilleland Creek
Bacteria—1428C
1 1 3 08/08/07 1 04/21/09 1 02/9/11 1
Greater Trinity Region—See entries for Cottonwood Branch & Grapevine Creek, Lower West Fork Trinity River Watersheds, Mountain Creek Lake Upstream Watersheds, Sycamore Creek, and Upper Trinity River                  
Greens Bayou in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1016, 1016A, 1016B, 1016C, and 1016D
8^ 5^ 8 06/02/10 8^ 08/12/10 8^ BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 8^
Guadalupe River Above Canyon Lake
Bacteria—1806
1 1 2 07/25/07 1 09/25/07 1 08/31/11 1
Guadalupe River Above Canyon Lake—Addendum I
Bacteria—1806D, 1806E
2 2 2 Via WQMP 01/18 2 05/08/18 2 Same activities as I-Plan approved 8/31/2011 2
Guadalupe River Above Canyon Lake—Addendum II
Bacteria—1806A
1 1 1 Via WQMP 04/2022 1 08/1/2022 1 Same activities as I-Plan approved 8/31/2011 1
Halls Bayou in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1006D, 1006I, 1006J
4 3# 4 09/15/10 4 09/27/10 4 BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 4
Hillebrandt Bayou
Bacteria—0704
1 1 1 08/11/21 1 02/01/22 1
Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—See entries for Armand Bayou; Brays Bayou; Buffalo and Whiteoak Bayous; Clear Creek; Eastern Houston; Greens Bayou; Halls Bayou; San Jacinto River, East and West Forks; Sims Bayou; and Lake Houston Watersheds
                 
Jarbo Bayou in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—2425B
1 1 1 01/24/18 1 03/29/18 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 1
Lake Austin
DO—1403
1 1 1 11/17/00 1 12/05/01
EPA declined
to take action
on this TMDL
0 07/13/01 1
Lake Houston Upstream Watersheds in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1004E, 1008, 1008H, 1009, 1009C, 1009D, 1009E, 1010, and 1011
15 9# 15 04/06/11 15 06/29/11 15 BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 15
Lake Houston Upstream Watersheds—Addendum I in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1008B, 1008C, 1008E, and 1011
6 4# 6 Submitted via WQMP 10/13 6 02/14/14 6 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 6
Lake Houston Upstream Watersheds—Addendum II in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1008J, 1010C
2 2 2 Submitted via WQMP 10/19 2 03/11/20 2 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 2
Lake Houston Upstream Watersheds—Addendum III in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1008I
1 1 1 Submitted via WQMP 10/20 1 03/08/21 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 1
Lake Houston Upstream Watersheds—Addendum IV in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1010
1 1 1 Submitted via WQMP 04/22 1 08/11/2022 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 1
Lake O’ the Pines
DO—0403
1 1 1 04/12/06 1 06/07/06 1 07/9/08 1
Lake Worth Watershed
PCBs—0807
1 1 1 08/10/05 1 10/13/05 1 08/23/06 1
Lake Worth Watershed—Addendum I
PCBs—0808
1 1 1 Submitted via WQMP 07/14 1 11/25/14 1 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 08/23/06 1
Lavaca River Above Tidal and Rocky Creek
Bacteria—1602, 1602B
2 2 2 08/14/19 2 10/25/19 2 08/14/19 2
Lavaca River Above Tidal and Rocky Creek - Addendum I
Bacteria—1602
1 1 1 Submitted via WQMP 01/22 1 06/08/2022 1 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 08/14/19 1
Lower Sabinal River
nitrate-nitrogen—2110
1 1 1 08/10/05 1 10/13/05 1 08/23/06 1
Lower San Antonio River
Bacteria—1901
1 1 5 08/20/08 1 10/20/08 1 08/08/18 5*
Lower West Fork Trinity River Watersheds in the
Greater Trinity Region
Bacteria—0841, 0841B, 0841C, 0841E, 0841G, 0841H, 0841J, 0841L, 0841M, 0841R, 0841T, and 0841U
13 12# 13 09/24/13 13 11/07/13 13 Greater Trinity
I-Plan approved 12/11/2013
13
Mission and Aransas Rivers
Bacteria—2001, 2003
2 2 2 05/25/2016 2 08/09/16 2 05/25/2016 2
Mission and Aransas Rivers—Addendum I
Bacteria—2004, 2004B
2 2 2 Via WQMP 10/17 2 02/08/18 2 Same activities as I-Plan approved 05/25/2016 2
Mountain Creek Lake Upstream Watersheds in the
Greater Trinity Region
Bacteria—0841F, 0841K, 0841N, 0841V
4 4 4 11/02/16 4 12/07/16 4 Subsumed in Greater Trinity
I-Plan approved 12/11/13
4
Mountain Creek Lake Upstream Watersheds—Addendum I in the
Greater Trinity Region
Bacteria—0841Q
1 1 1 Submitted via WQMP 10/19 1 03/11/20 1 Subsumed in Greater Trinity
I-Plan approved 12/11/13
1
Mountain Creek Lake Upstream Watersheds—Addendum II in the
Greater Trinity Region
Bacteria—0841P
1 1 1 Submitted via WQMP 4/22 1 08/11/2022 1 Subsumed in Greater Trinity
I-Plan approved 12/11/13
1
Navasota River Below Lake Limestone
Bacteria—1209
2 1 2 08/28/19 2 10/25/19 2 08/28/19 2

Neches River Tidal Bacteria—0601

4 1 4 7/19/2023 4
North Bosque River
Phosphorus
(narrative)—1226, 1255
2 2 6 02/9/01 2 12/13/01 2 12/13/02 2
Nueces Bay
Zinc in Oyster Tissue—2482
1 1 1 11/01/06 1 12/15/06 1 10/24/07 1
Orange County Watersheds
Bacteria, Dissolved Oxygen, pH—0508, 0508A, 0508B, 0508C, 0511, 0511A, 0511B, 0511C, and 0511E
17 9# 29 06/13/07 17 08/28/07 17 08/05/15 17
Orange County Watersheds
*Revised TMDLs
Bacteria, Dissolved Oxygen, pH - 0508_01, 0508_02, 0508_03, 0508_04, 0508B_01, 0508C_01, 0511_01, 0511_02, 0511_03, 0511_04, 0511A_02, 0511B_01, 0511C_01, 0511E_01
*These TMDLs are not counted towards the total count because they are revisions to existing TMDLs
23 8 23 08/26/2020 23 10/9/2020 23 Same as the original TMDLs  23
Oso Bay
Bacteria—2485
1 1 3 08/22/07 1 06/08/08 1    
Oso Creek
Bacteria—2485A
1 1 1 07/31/19 1 10/25/19 1
Petronila Creek Above Tidal
Chloride, Sulfate, Total Dissolved Solids—2204
3 1 6 01/10/07 3 03/14/07 3 10/10/07 3
Salado Creek
DO—1910
1 1 7 10/12/01 1 08/08/03 1 Creek is
supporting
the aquatic
life use,
so IP
is not needed.
N/A
San Jacinto River, East and West Forks; Lake Houston; and Crystal Creek
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1002, 1003, 1004, 1004D
7 4# 7 08/24/16 7 10/07/16 7 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 7
San Jacinto River, East and West Forks; Lake Houston; and Crystal Creek—Addendum I
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1015A
1 1 1 Via WQMP
10/18
1 02/22/19 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 1
Sandy Creek and Wolf Creek
Bacteria—0603A, 0603B
2 2 2 05/18/22  08/18/2022 06/14/2023  2
Sims Bayou in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1007D, 1007N
4 2# 4 09/15/10 4 09/27/10 4 BIG I-Plan approved 01/30/13 4
Sims Bayou—Addendum I
in the Houston-Galveston Region
Bacteria—1007A
1 1 1 Via WQMP 04/13 1 08/28/13 1 Subsumed in BIG I-Plan approved 1/30/13 1
Sycamore Creek in the
Greater Trinity Region
Bacteria—0806E
1 1 1 01/16/19 1 03/27/19 1 Subsumed in Greater Trinity
I-Plan approved 12/11/13
1
Tres Palacios Creek
Bacteria—1501
1 1 1 01/24/18 1 03/29/18 1 01/24/18 1
Tributaries of
the Neches River below Lake Palestine                Bacteria—0604A, 0604B, 0604C, 0604M
4 4 4 10/5/2022 4 6/7/23 4 In Development In Development
Upper Oyster Creek
Bacteria—1245
1 1 3 08/08/07 1 09/28/07 1 01/15/14 1
Upper Oyster Creek
Dissolved Oxygen—1245
2 1# 2 07/28/10 2 09/21/10 2 01/15/14 (bacteria and oxygen in same plan) 2
Upper San Antonio River
Bacteria—1910, 1910A, 1911
3 3 13 07/25/07 3 09/25/07 3 04/06/16 3
Upper San Antonio River—Addendum I
Bacteria—1910D, 1911B, 1911C, 1911D, 1911E
7 5# 7 Via WQMP 04/16 7 08/09/16 7 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 04/06/16 7
Upper San Antonio River—Addendum II
Bacteria—1911I
1 1 1 Via WQMP 10/19 1 03/11/20 1 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 04/06/16 1
Upper Texas Coast Oyster Waters—with Attachment (Addendum) 1.
Bacteria—2421, 2422, 2423, 2424, 2432, 2439
6 6 6 08/20/08 6 02/04/09 & 04/1/12 6 08/19/15 6
Upper Texas Coast Oyster Waters—Addendum II
Bacteria—2435OW
Via WQMP 01/12 04/20/12 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 08/19/15
Upper Texas Coast Oyster Waters—Addendum III
Bacteria—2433OW, 2434OW
2 2 2 Via WQMP 04/12 2 08/07/12 2 Same activities as in I-Plan approved 8/19/15 2
Upper Trinity River in the
Greater Trinity Region
Bacteria—0805
2 1# 2 05/11/11 2 08/03/11 2 Greater Trinity
I-Plan approved 12/11/13
2
  Total Impairments Addressed Total Segments Addressed Total Assessment Units Addressed
  Total TMDLs Adopted   Total TMDLs Approved   Total TMDLs Addressed by I-Plan
Totals 331
Impairments
228
segments
424 AUs   331 TMDLs    326 TMDLs    320 TMDLs

Due to administrative considerations, the two TMDLs for segment 2435 were added by amendment, but are not included in the state's overall count of TMDLs.

#Since 2008, impairments and TMDLs are counted by the number of assessment units (AUs) addressed. Since AUs are sub-sections of segments, the number of impairments addressed may be greater than the number of segments. When there are multiple impaired AUs for a single parameter in a single segment, the segment is counted only once.

^The number of impairments (TMDLs) reported in the summary table is greater than the number shown in the title of the TMDL report. This is due to a change in EPA reporting requirements that was made after the TCEQ’s report of this project was completed and published (see below under "How TMDLs Are Counted").

*Between the time One TMDL for the Lower San Antonio River was adopted and its I-Plan was approved, Segment 1901 was subdivided into five assessment units. Consequently, the I-Plan was written for five TMDLs rather than one.

Back to the top of the page Back to top

How TMDLs Are Counted

The EPA requires one TMDL for each impairment listed in a water body. An impairment is the combination of the use that is affected (such as support of aquatic life) with the pollutant or condition of concern (such as mercury or low dissolved oxygen). For example, if Jones Creek was listed as not meeting the aquatic life use because of low dissolved oxygen concentrations, and not meeting the fish consumption use because of mercury in fish tissue, two TMDLs would be required for Jones Creek.

Prior to 2008, the number of impairments was reported by water-quality segment, as required by EPA guidance. During that period, the TCEQ used the term “water body” synonymously with “water-quality segment” when reporting how many segments were addressed by TMDLs.

In 2008, the EPA began requiring the TCEQ to develop and record one impairment (and TMDL) for each assessment unit within a water-quality segment. Consequently, the TCEQ reports multiple TMDLs (impairments) where once it would have counted only one. The TCEQ continues to report the number of water bodies addressed through TMDLs by water-quality segment.

A water-quality segment is a geographic portion of a river, lake, or bay that has relatively homogeneous chemical, physical, and hydrological characteristics. A segment is assigned a unique number for the purpose of categorization and provides a basic unit for managing water quality. In some cases, a segment may be the same as the entirety of the water body; for example, a small lake may not be divided into multiple numbered segments.

An assessment unit is a further geographic subdivision of a segment. For example, Segment 0200 may have five assessment units.

Projects Develop Multiple TMDLs

To be most efficient with resources of time and money, the TMDL Program may address the same pollutant in multiple water bodies through a single project, or may address multiple similar pollutants (such as three different pesticides) in one segment through a single project. Hence, a single project may produce many TMDLs.

Federal law requires that the EPA take formal action to approve or disapprove any TMDLs adopted by the states. So, on any particular date, the number of TMDLs adopted by the Commission may differ from the number approved by the EPA.

Back to the top of the page Back to top

Communities Working Together