TCEQ’s Stance on Rio Grande Water Distribution: Fort Quitman, Texas
TCEQ’s position is that water from the Rio Grande originating between El Paso and Fort Quitman should be allocated entirely to the United States.
On this page:
Background on the Issue
The United States and Mexico have a long history of both cooperation and conflict over how water is distributed from the Rio Grande, also known as the Rio Bravo in Mexico.
The Rio Grande serves as a natural boundary between Texas and Mexico, positioning Texas at the center of ongoing water management challenges.
Treaties Related to Allocating Water from the Rio Grande
Two treaties provide formal agreements between the United States and Mexico over how water is distributed between the two countries:
- The 1906 Convention states that the United States must deliver 60,000 acre-feet of water annually to Mexico at the international diversion point near El Paso. In exchange for this water, Mexico waives the rights to any waters originating between El Paso and Fort Quitman. Fort Quitman is about 90 miles downstream of El Paso.
- The 1944 Treaty divides water originating downstream from Fort Quitman to the Gulf evenly between the United States and Mexico. The International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) was established at this time to oversee water distribution between the two countries and resolve any disputes.

IBWC Water Distribution Practices
The 1944 Treaty states that 50 percent of any water originating after Fort Quitman all the way to the Gulf of Mexico is allocated to Mexico.
However, IBWC has also historically allocated 50 percent of the water originating between El Paso and Fort Quitman to Mexico.
TCEQ’s Stance
TCEQ asserts that any water originating between El Paso and Fort Quitman should be allocated entirely to the United States in accordance with both the 1906 Convention and 1944 Treaty.
While the 1944 Treaty does allocate 50 percent of the water originating after Fort Quitman to Mexico, it does not allocate 50 percent of the water originating between El Paso and Fort Quitman to Mexico. Allocating 50 percent of this water to Mexico deprives Texas users of valuable water resources, especially during times of drought.
Correspondence and Other Publications
The correspondence in the following sections show the chain of communication between TCEQ and other entities, including IBWC, regarding the issue of water allocation at Fort Quitman.
Letters to and from the Texas House of Representatives and to the U.S. Department of State (2013-2014)
TCEQ escalates the issue to the U.S. Department of State after obtaining support from the Texas House of Representatives.
Date | Description | Document Title |
---|---|---|
August 26, 2014 | TCEQ and TWDB thank Rep. Lucio from the Texas House of Representatives for his support and confirm that the issue has been escalated to the U.S. Department of State. | Letter from TWDB and TCEQ chairs to Rep. Eddie Lucio, III |
August 1, 2014 | Rep. Lucio affirms TCEQ’s stance on the issue and requests assistance in escalating the issue to the U.S. Department of State. | Letter from Rep. Eddie Lucio, III to TWDB and TCEQ chairs |
August 22, 2013 | TCEQ requests direct involvement from the U.S. Department of State to resolve the issue with water allocation in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. | Letter from Commissioner Rubinstein to U.S. State Department |
Letters to and from IBWC (2013)
The following letters show the correspondence that took place in 2013 between the IBWC and TCEQ in relation to how water is distributed at Fort Quitman.
Date | Description | Document Title |
---|---|---|
August 30, 2013 | IBWC affirms that Mexico must produce a water management plan in accordance with Treaty requirements. | Response Letter from IBWC to Commissioner Rubinstein |
August 29, 2013 | TCEQ expresses disappointment that a meeting scheduled for August 29 was cancelled and mentions a possible meeting on September 11. | Letter from Commissioner Rubinstein to IBWC |
August 6, 2013 | IBWC states that its U.S. Section has thoroughly reviewed the evidence surrounding the issue and that any additional questions may be forwarded to a contact at the U.S. Department of State. | Response Letter from IBWC to Commissioner Rubinstein |
June 20, 2013 | IBWC acknowledges TCEQ’s June 17 letter and states they will be responding in the near future about meeting. | Response Letter from IBWC to Commissioner Rubinstein |
June 17, 2013 | TCEQ responds to IBWC’s June 12 and again requests a formal meeting to discuss IBWC’s decision. | Response Letter from Commissioner Rubinstein to IBWC on Water Allocation |
June 12, 2013 | IBWC responds to TCEQ’s June 7 letter and agrees to a meeting. | Letters from IBWC on Water Allocation |
June 7, 2013 | TCEQ responds to the May 15 letter from IBWC, disagreeing with IBWC’s conclusion and again requesting a meeting. | Letter Responding to IBWC Commissioner Edward Drusina |
May 15, 2013 | IBWC rejects TCEQ’s request, stating that its historical water accounting practices have been in accordance with the 1906 Convention and 1944 Water Treaty. | Letter from IBWC Commissioner Edward Drusina |
May 14, 2013 | TCEQ follows up on the letter sent May 18, 2012, calling for action on the issue and stating that the follow-up meeting previously promised still had not been scheduled. | Letter from TCEQ Commissioner Carlos Rubinstein |
Letters to and from IBWC (2008-2012)
The following letters show the correspondence that took place between 2008 and 2012 between IBWC and TCEQ, as well as the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) and various water rights stakeholders.
Date | Description | Document Title |
---|---|---|
October 15, 2012 | IBWC states that it will be conducting further investigation regarding the issue and mentions a binational meeting where they will be discussing the issue. | Letter from IBWC |
June 27, 2012 | IBWC acknowledges that it received the May 18 letter from TCEQ and that it would be carefully reviewing the information and scheduling a meeting once they had completed a thorough review. | Response from the IBWC |
June 21, 2012 | TWDB expresses its support of TCEQ’s request for IBWC to change its water accounting practices. | Letter from the TWDB |
June 1, 2012 | The Rio Grande Regional Water authority expresses its support for the letter from TCEQ sent on May 18, 2012. | Letter from Rio Grande Regional Water Authority |
May 29, 2012 | The Rio Grande Watermaster Advisory Committee expresses its support for resolving the issue surrounding allocation practices for water reaching Fort Quitman. | Letter from Rio Grande Watermaster Advisory Committee |
May 28, 2012 | The Lower Rio Grande Valley District Managers’ Association agrees with the May 18 letter from TCEQ. | Letter from Lower Rio Grande Valley District Managers Association |
May 18, 2012 | TCEQ submits a letter on behalf of TCEQ and other stakeholders sharing that it has conducted additional research on the matter and requesting that IBWC’s water accounting practices be reevaluated. | Letter from TCEQ Commissioner Carlos Rubinstein |
June 30, 2008 | TCEQ requests that IBWC changes its water accounting practices. | Letter from TCEQ Commissioner Buddy Garcia |
Rio Grande Water Allocation Publications
The publications and treaties below provide additional background on the issue of how water from the Rio Grande is distributed, including at Fort Quitman.
Date | Description | Document Title |
---|---|---|
2011 | Provides background information on the issue, with information relating to Fort Quitman. | Overview of the Rio Grande in Texas and Below Fort Quitman |
2005 | Provides background information on the issue, including the treaties. | Bi-national Rio Grande Summit – Legal and Institutional Aspects of International Water Allocation in the Rio Grande |