Skip to Content

Search tceq.texas.gov

Questions or Comments: rules@tceq.texas.gov

Pending Rule Adoptions

Pending Adoptions are staff recommendations that have been filed with the Chief Clerk, but have not yet been voted on by the commissioners.

Pending Adoptions are staff recommendations that have been filed with the Chief Clerk, but have not yet been voted on by the commissioners. At a future date, the commissioners will discuss and either vote to adopt, continue the adoption to a future date, remand the adoption back to staff for revisions, or withdraw the rule package as proposed. If approved, the adoption will be filed with the Texas Register and moved to Adoptions. These drafts are courtesy copies and are subject to change. This site will be updated only if the agency makes substantive changes before the agenda date.

There are no pending adoptions at this time.

Pending Adoption Date Rule Project Number Short Title/Description Pending Adoption (PDF)
Approval Date
2/25/26
2025-032-116-AI SBs 763 and 2351: Update to Protectiveness Review and Amendment Requirements for Concrete Batch Plants
Rulemaking implements SB 763 and SB 2351 requiring a protectiveness review to be conducted on the CBP SP at least once every 8 years and outlines requirements for updated authorizations when the CBP SP or CBPEC SP are amended.
Approval Date
2/25/26
2025-033-331-WS SB 616 and SB 1061: Injection Through the Edwards Aquifer for Aquifer Storage and Recovery and Class III Production Area Authorization Amendment
SB 616 would amend 30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) §331.19 to allow wells that transect the Edwards Aquifer, as long as the wells inject water into a geologic formation that underlies the Edwards Aquifer as part of an aquifer storage and recovery project and are located in the area of Williamson County east of Interstate Highway 35 or in Medina County. SB 1061 would amend 30 TAC §331.107 to include prioritization of conservation of regional water supplies when considering an application to amend a restoration table value or range table and would also amend 30 TAC §331.108 to include that amendment to a Class III PAA authorization is not subject to opportunity for a contested case hearing if certain conditions are met.